Re: I heard that MTC is being sued
Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:29 pm
The only point that scares me on this lawsuit that applies to our favorite software is the following:
17. Provo Craft recently learned about the existence of a new company that calls itself
Make the Cut LLC, and its apparent owner, Andrew Heinlein (the Defendants).
18. Defendants are marketing a personal computer-based software product called
MAKE-THE-CUT! which, according to Defendants, provides a computer interface that allows
people to cut virtually any shape they can obtain using a CRICUT® machine without needing to
purchase Provo Craft’s cartridges. As with CRICUT DESIGNSTUDIO®, people can buy
MAKE-THE-CUT! software and load it into their personal computer either with a CD-ROM disc
or from the internet.
19. Defendants had advertised and sold early versions of this software to permit their
users to make crude copies of virtually any pattern the user could find, including Provo Craft’s
copyrighted CRICUT® patterns. The copies were not easy to make, and they were not easy to
make well, especially if the pattern was complicated.
20. Defendants have been offering services that allow their users to share those crude
copies with each other. For example, Defendants host an electronic “gallery” on the internet
5
If they win on these points they can extend their grip on other companies doing similar business...
17. Provo Craft recently learned about the existence of a new company that calls itself
Make the Cut LLC, and its apparent owner, Andrew Heinlein (the Defendants).
18. Defendants are marketing a personal computer-based software product called
MAKE-THE-CUT! which, according to Defendants, provides a computer interface that allows
people to cut virtually any shape they can obtain using a CRICUT® machine without needing to
purchase Provo Craft’s cartridges. As with CRICUT DESIGNSTUDIO®, people can buy
MAKE-THE-CUT! software and load it into their personal computer either with a CD-ROM disc
or from the internet.
19. Defendants had advertised and sold early versions of this software to permit their
users to make crude copies of virtually any pattern the user could find, including Provo Craft’s
copyrighted CRICUT® patterns. The copies were not easy to make, and they were not easy to
make well, especially if the pattern was complicated.
20. Defendants have been offering services that allow their users to share those crude
copies with each other. For example, Defendants host an electronic “gallery” on the internet
5
If they win on these points they can extend their grip on other companies doing similar business...